Governed People Operations · Microsoft 365

Clear guidance. Safe handover.

The solution connects employee self-service, manager support, and structured intake with roles, audit, and human approval. It is not an autonomous HR decision-maker, but a controlled service layer for Microsoft 365.

Copilot StudioSharePoint backendHuman in the loop
People Ops Intake CockpitReview Queue
Workplace · W004Parking request · new
Feedback · AFB2anonymised · review
Manager check-indraft · approval
Policy Q&Aanswered · source
Controlled handling

Review workplace request

The agent prepared the category, summary, and next step. A human takes ownership and decides on the action.

Role and permission checkedSource and policy linkedAudit record preparedHuman approval pending

The purpose

Many People Ops questions repeat. Accountability remains human.

Employees need fast, reliable guidance. Managers need sound preparation. HR and Workplace Services need structured cases rather than incomplete free-text messages. The agent takes on the repeatable work—not the sensitive decision.

01 · SELF-SERVICE

Answers with sources

Questions about working time, remote work, development, private device use, or workplace services are answered from curated SharePoint content.

02 · ASSISTANCE

Prepare managers better

Structures and drafts for one-to-ones, goals, probation, or performance conversations—with a clear line between preparation and personnel decisions.

03 · INTAKE

Route requests cleanly

Workplace tickets, sensitive HR requests, and anonymous feedback are categorised, minimised, stored traceably, and passed to the right role.

Interactive case flow

From request to controlled action.

Select a stage. The flow shows where knowledge, safety checks, the backend, and a human decision work together.

01Request & roleEmployee · manager
02Knowledge & policySharePoint · rules
03Safety checkPrivacy · limits
04Intake & auditLists · flows
05Human reviewApproval · handoff
Understand request and role

The agent recognises the mode, topic, and required context. It only gathers information that the selected process genuinely needs.

Six controlled working modes

One agent. Different roles, data, and outcomes.

POLICY

Policy Q&A

Answer employee questions from curated policies, including source and escalation when the answer is unclear.

MANAGER

Manager check-in

Prepare conversation structure, goals, and notes—without performance judgement or hidden assessment.

HR INTAKE

Sensitive request

Capture only necessary facts, mark sensitivity, and hand the case to HR under controlled conditions.

ANONYMOUS

Feedback & speak-up

Minimise content, assess re-identification risk, and promise only the anonymity the process can actually provide.

WORKPLACE

Workplace Services

Capture requests about parking, catering, charging points, or equipment as traceable work items.

GOALS

Goals & development

Structure drafts and check-ins while keeping ownership and approval with people.

Microsoft-native architecture

Knowledge, identity, process, and governance on one platform.

The demo uses a dedicated SharePoint site, curated knowledge, operational lists, role models, and a Copilot Studio agent. A separate intake cockpit exposes generated records to operators.

KNOWLEDGE

SharePoint

Curated HR, manager, employee, and workplace knowledge rather than uncontrolled web search.

AGENT

Copilot Studio

A conversational layer with dedicated instructions, knowledge, and controlled action paths.

PROCESS

Lists & Automate

Cases, feedback, policy rules, check-ins, goals, tickets, and audit as structured data.

CONTROL

Entra & Purview

Roles, groups, permissions, privacy, and governance as core design inputs.

Microsoft 365SharePointCopilot StudioPower AutomateEntra IDTeams-readyHuman in the loopAudit

Hard boundaries

No HR automation at any cost.

The more sensitive the context, the more important data minimisation, traceable sources, and real accountability become. The agent may prepare, structure, and route. It may not judge people.

  • No personnel decisionsNo recommendations on dismissal, disciplinary action, pay, promotion, or individual suitability.
  • No covert monitoringNo Teams sentiment analysis, individual risk scoring, or behavioural profiling.
  • No false anonymityAnonymous processes are described only as far as technology, access, and re-identification risk allow.
  • No action without ownershipSensitive cases remain in review queues and require an explicitly accountable human role.